|
MSR
Prices Mixed in April The
MSR market was mixed for the month of April with some of MIAC’s
MSR price indexes showing price appreciation and others showing
a slight depreciation. The MIAC Conventional 30-Yr Index had the
largest gains at a price of 1.97 times the servicing fee, up 12.6%
from the previous month. The MIAC Conventional Balloon Index gained
7.1% ending the month at a 1.66 multiple. While the Conventional
30-Yr and Conventional Balloon indexes saw gains in April, the MIAC
Conventional 15-Yr Index experienced a slight decline. The MIAC
GNMA 15-Yr and 30-Yr Indexes also experienced slight declines in
price.
Since May 15th 2002, all MSR asset classes have experienced significant
price depreciation. The MIAC Conventional 15-Yr Index is down 49.1
% and the Conventional 30-Yr Index is down 56.7% driven by prepayment
speeds more than doubling over the last year.
These
MIAC Indexes represents the MSR price behavior of the entire 30-Year
Conventional Agency MSR and 30-Year Jumbo MSR market and particular
components within the marketplace have declined to a greater or
lesser extent.
|
|
| 
|
|
|
Interest
rates continued to rally in the month of April especially at the
long end of the yield curve. The 5-Yr swap rate was down 3 basis
points and the 10-Yr was down 5 basis points. In March, rates had
widened with the 10-Yr swap rate up 13.5 basis points, giving some
short lived relief to the MSR market.
The FNMA 30-Yr and GNMA 30-Yr Current Coupon Yields were both down
10 basis points in April matching their lowest levels in history.
On the other hand. The 1-Mth Libor rate rebounded from its record
lows in March, to end the month of April at 1.32.
|
|
|
|
After a flattening
of the swap curve in February, the curve reversed course in March
and steepened with the LIBOR 1 Month rate dropping and the 5-Yr
and 10-Yr swap rates rising.
In April, the curve reversed course again and flattened. The 1-Mth
LIBOR was up 2 bps, while the 10-Yr swap rate was down 5 bps. The
spread between the two rates is down to 286.5 bps from 293.5 at
the end of March.
The 1-Yr into 10-Yr swaption volatilities decreased for the second
straight month ending at 26.04%
|
|
|
MSRs
OASes Decline |
|
|
|
As we have discussed previously,
MIAC Analytics makes available Daily GSA OASes through the Daily
GSA pricing service. Each day, MIAC Analytics will use the previous
day’s current volatility of 1-Year into 10-Year swaption volatility
as a proxy for mortgage volatility.
The table below is the OASes computed in MIAC Analytics with the
actual GSA prices for six of the largest GSAs: Conventional 15-Year
6.0% Issue Year 1999, Conventional 15-Year 6.0% Issue Year 2001,
Conventional 30-Year 6.5% Issue Year 1999, Conventional 30-Year
6.5% Issue Year 2001, GNMA 30-Year 6.5% Issue Year 1999, and GNMA
30-Year 6.5% Issue Year 2001. The table displays the quarter-end
OASes from 6/29/2001 to 9/30/2002 and then displays the 12/31/2002
year-end OASes though the 4/30/2003 April-end OASes. These recent
dates were selected because the BMA dealer consensus prepayment
speeds are available to assist in the MSR pricing process.
After two months of rising OASes, we saw declining spreads in April.
This decline can be attributed to a decrease in long term interest
rates and volatility. When the yield curve flattens forward curves
flatten and therefore, expected prepayment speeds will increase
and Option Adjusted Spreads will decrease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
servicing.com has
provided daily IO/PO pricing on a portfolio of Trust IOs for several
years. As a result, we can provide a comparison of historical Trust
IO OASes with the same interest rate model, volatility inputs and
OAS cash flow model as the historical GSA OASes. One can see from
the table above that Trust IO OASes don’t appear to be well
correlated to OAS behavior of the GSAs. This behavior does not support
the use of Trust IO OASes as benchmark OASes for the MSR marketplace. |
|
|
|
In the table above,
the OAS durations or measurements of the anticipated MSR price sensitivity
were computed with a constant OAS. As the mortgage market sold off
in January, these in-the-money MSRs experienced a lengthening in
duration but as the market rallied in February, there was a shortening
of duration. In March, the changes in duration were mixed with some
assets experiencing a lengthening and others a shortening. In April,
we see a shortening of duration with the largest changes in Conventional
30’s at a 6.5 coupon. The Conventional 30 6.5 in 1999 experienced
a decrease in duration of 18% and the 2001 issue year experienced
a decline of 19%. |
|
|
|
OAS Convexities:
The convexity behavior of MSRs
again is not obvious to a casual MSR market observer. Over the past
six months, the convexity profiles of the MSRs listed below have
improved dramatically. As prepayments hit record high expectations,
if interest rates continue to fall, prepayment expectations will
continue to go up but at a decreasing rate of increase. This decreasing
rate of increase is captured in these GSA convexity profiles. In
addition, if interest rates go up or down from here, the durations
of these assets will further shorten. Because MSRs now have significant
positive convexity, hedging these MSRs with long highly convex,
options positions continues to be an expensive hedge choice.
|
|
|
|
|
BMA Prepay Speeds Reach New Highs
The following tables reflect the largest BMA asset
classes and the historical dealer median prepayment forecasts. |
|
|
| |
Red indicates the highest forecasts on
record and yellows the second highest. |
|
|
|
May 1st, 2003 BMA
dealer consensus prepayment speeds came in at mixed levels compared
to the speeds that we saw for April 1st, 2003 with some assets recording
record highs and others slightly slowing. A significant portion
of the mortgage market continues to be in-the-money and we expect
prepayment speeds to remain at or near record highs as interest
rates remain at record lows. Listed below are the largest and newest
asset classes in the mortgage market. |
|
|
|
More detailed BMA
prepayment information can be obtained at www.servicing.com by viewing
the Daily MIMs (Mortgage Industry Medians) data product. |
|
|
MIAC’s DynamicMIMs Highly Successful! |
|
|
|
DynamicMIMs is MIAC’s
model to forecast where dealer consensus prepayment will be given
any change in interest rates. The coefficients to DynamicMIMs are
updated with each BMA survey results. DynamicMIMs is used at the
beginning of a MSR hedge period for FAS 133 hedge effectiveness
testing to predict where dealer consensus prepayments will be. At
the end of the hedge period, dealer consensus BMA speeds are used
in the pricing of the MSRs.
Below is a table indicating the statistical reliability of MIAC's
DynamicMIMsTM forecasting model. Each time an actual BMA forecast
set is provided, MIAC will update the coefficients to the DynamicMIMs
model. For example, ninety days prior to an actual BMA forecast,
the DynamicMIMs model is updated and can then be used to forecast
BMA forecasts. If the coefficients to the DynamicMIMs model are
used with the actual rate environment 90 days later, we refer to
these as the 90-Day Forecast. The 90-Day Forecasts are then measured
against the actual BMA forecasts 90 days later. If these same coefficients
and DynamicMIMs model are used with the actual rate environment
15-days later, we refer to these as the 15-Day Forecast.
A paired two-sample T-Test is used to determine whether a sample's
means are distinct. This T-Test form does not assume that the variances
of both populations are equal. The corresponding 95% confidence
critical value based on a sample size of 15 is 2.145. If the T-Test
value does not exceed the critical value, then there is sufficient
evidence that the mean PSA forecast is not distinct from the mean
BMA PSA results. This testing was conducted with BMA from 5/15/2002
to 4/30/2003. More results can be found at www.servicing.com
|
|
|
| servicing.com
Contacts |
|
|